Scientists consider that some climate change is already inevitable, even if anthropogenic greenhouse emissions are stabilised immediately. Adaptation measures are therefore needed, irrespective of any mitigation action. But policy discussion is focussed on deterministic responses, generally risk-based „worst case‟ scenarios. An example is the development of more stringent standards for buildings and for coastal development. Such „climate proofing‟ is misconceived in the face of the huge uncertainties involved. Economists need to promote more rational policy frameworks that draw on cost-benefit analysis, including the use of „real options‟ to minimise the cost to society of adapting to climate change.

Author names: 
Dobes, L.
Aares, A. A.
Year: 
2009
Reference: 

Dobes, L., & AARES, A. A. and R. E. S.-. (2009). ADAPTING MORE CLEVERLY TO CLIMATE CHANGE BY USING “REAL OPTIONS” TO ADDRESS THE UNCERTAINTIES. Presented at the 53rd Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Cairns, 11-13 February 2009. Retrieved from http://purl.umn.edu/47615

Geographical area: 
Policy areas considered: 
Decision-Support Tools: